Jury Awards $9.1 Million In Defective Hip Implant Lawsuit

Comments Off on Jury Awards $9.1 Million In Defective Hip Implant Lawsuit

defective hip implantA Los Angeles jury has awarded $9.1 million to a man who received a Durom Cup hip implant made by Zimmer.

According to a report in Lawyers and Settlements, the product defect lawsuit alleged that Zimmer was aware of the design defect in its hip implant, which is reported to cause bone and tissue damage in patients who receive them leading to pain and replacement surgeries.

Lawsuit Alleged Defective Design

The Zimmer Durom Cup was implanted in about 13,000 patients before it was removed b the U.S. market in 2008. In 2007, the plaintiff in this case, Gary Kline, received the defective product. He had to get it removed just 15 months later.

According to the lawsuit he filed against the medical device manufacturer, Kline endured two traumatic surgeries in 15 months that cause scar tissue and muscle damage.

The jury found Zimmer negligent in the design of the Durom Cup and that the company failed to warn consumers about the product’s defects.

The verdict included $153,000 in medical bills and $9 million in past and future noneconomic damages such as pain and suffering and mental anguish.

Although the judge in this case had denied a request for punitive damages, the jury awarded Kline about $3 million more than what he had asked.

Serious Problems for Consumers

Statistics show that the failure rate for Zimmer Durom Cup metal-on-metal hip implants was a whopping 11 percent. This means that those who received the implants had such severe problems with them that they either had to get them removed or replaced, which means they had to undergo unnecessary surgery.

Patients reported a number of severe symptoms including pain and stiffness, sharp groin pain, noticeable limping, unsteady gait and lack of endurance while walking.

In many patients, the metal-on-metal hips released ions and toxins into the blood stream causing severe health effects such as inflammation, bone loss and even organ damage.

Protecting Your Rights

If you have suffered severe side effects as a result of receiving a Zimmer or other hip implant or medical device, please remember that you have legal right.

Manufacturers have a responsibility and a legal obligation to make products that are safe and healthy for consumers.

These implants are products that are surgically placed inside patients’ bodies. In order to remove and replace them, patients must undergo painful and costly surgeries, not to mention spend time away from work and endure a long recovery.

If you or a loved one has been adversely affected by a defective medical device, please contact an experienced product defect lawyer to better understand your legal rights and options.

FDA To Review Essure Birth Control Amid Mounting Concerns

Comments Off on FDA To Review Essure Birth Control Amid Mounting Concerns

Essure Birth ControlFederal regulators have said they will hold a public meeting to review scientific data regarding the safety and effectiveness of birth control device Essure.

According to an NBC New York news report, officials with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have said they will hold the meeting after media reports uncovered inconsistencies in a clinical trial survey used to win FDA approval for the birth control device.

Reports of Problems

Essure is a device that was approved by regulators in 2002 and is manufactured by pharmaceutical company, Bayer.

It basically consists of two metal coils that are inserted into a woman’s fallopian tubes to create a permanent barrier to conception.

Since the device was approved, FDA has documented more than 5,000 reports of medical problems linked to Essure ranging from headaches and fatigue to weight gain and severe abdominal pain.

In more than 400 cases, patients or doctors reported that Essure coils migrated from the fallopian tubes to other parts of the reproductive system.

In five cases, it was reported that fetal deaths occurred after the device failed to prevent pregnancy.

So far, in the United States, about 750,000 women have been implanted with the device, which would amount to one complication for every 150 patients.

In 2013, NBC’s I-Team secured records, which showed that an Essure clinical trial patient reported pelvic discomfort or pain seven times during eight years of follow-up.

In spite of that, clinical trial researchers reportedly marked the woman’s comfort level as “excellent.”

Responsibility of Manufacturers

Medical device manufacturers have a legal obligation to conduct clinical trials and review the results of those trials truthfully before the products are marketed or sold.

As product liability lawyers who represent victims of defective medical devices, we will be closely watching this FDA hearing to see what the panel found and what the facts are with Essure.

Manufacturers who deliberately hide information from consumers or post misleading information so consumers will buy their products, should be held accountable for their wrongdoing.

If you have suffered adverse health effects as a result of using Essure or any other defective medical device, it is crucial that you obtain the information necessary to protect your legal rights.

You may be eligible to receive compensation for damages including medical expenses, lost wages, hospitalization, pain and suffering and emotional distress.

Patient Sues Medical Device Manufacturer Over Superbug Outbreak

Comments Off on Patient Sues Medical Device Manufacturer Over Superbug Outbreak

UCLA SuperbugAn 18-year-old patient is suing a medical device manufacturer blaming the company for a superbug outbreak at the UCLA Medical Center, which infected at least seven patients and has been blamed for the death of at least two.

According to a CBS Los Angeles news report, the lawsuit was filed by Aaron Young in Los Angeles Superior Court against Olympus America, Inc. seeking unspecified damages, alleging products liability, fraud and negligence.

Lack of Protocols for Sanitizing

Young still remains a patient at the hospital after he and many others were exposed to a contaminated endoscope between October and January.

The lawsuit alleges that the company redesigned its duodenoscope last year. However, it did not offer a clear method to clean and disinfect the scopes, which have a complex construction and many tiny parts.

The lawsuit alleged that Olympus failed to take the critical step of establishing cleaning and disinfecting protocols with medical facilities and professionals.

Instead, the manufacturer provided doctors and hospitals with a safety cleaning protocol for an older endoscope that had a significantly different design.

As a result, users were not able to properly clean and sanitize the redesigned scope, the lawsuit states. The lawsuit does not blame UCLA for the superbug outbreak.

So far, the hospital has notified 179 patients who underwent these endoscopic procedures between October and January that they may have been exposed to the superbug, also known as CRE. Hospital officials were able to trace the infections to the tainted duodenoscopes.

Holding Product Manufacturers Liable

Based on statements made by experts to media, it appears that this superbug is tough to treat even with antibiotics.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a safety alert to hospitals and doctors warning about the potential for contamination with this particular device. About 500,000 people get treated and diagnosed with these types of endoscopes.

It is not clear if the manufacturer is planning on issuing a recall for these endoscopes.

It is unacceptable for a manufacturer to put a product, especially a medical device used on cancer patients and other seriously ill individuals that could pose an infection risk.

Apparently, this device has so many nooks and crannies that it may be impossible to thoroughly clean and disinfect it.

How is such as product even in the market?

As product liability attorneys, we certainly hope the FDA is looking into this issue to ensure the safety of thousands of patients who may be exposed across the nation.

UCLA Superbug Outbreak Linked To Contaminated Endoscopes

Comments Off on UCLA Superbug Outbreak Linked To Contaminated Endoscopes

EndoscopeThe U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a warning about a particular type of endoscope saying the devices that are used to look inside patients’ bodies, are so poorly designed that it is not possible to clean and disinfect them thoroughly.

According to an NBC news report, the endoscopes have been linked to an outbreak of drug-resistant bacteria that have killed at least two patients and infected five more at UCLA Medical Center.

The university has also sent out warnings to about 180 people saying that they may have been exposed to the potentially deadly bacteria.

How Do The Endoscopes Work?

The endoscopes the FDA has issued the warning about are not the scopes used in procedures such as colonoscopy. But they are used in diagnosing and treating a range of diseases and health conditions from gallstones to cancer. The scopes in question, generally called duodenoscopes, are used at least on a half-million people in the United States and have a number of tiny parts.

Duodenoscopes are flexible lighted tubes that are threaded through a patient’s mouth, throat, stomach and into the top of the small intestine, also known as the duodenum. They contain a hollow channel that allows the injection of a contrast dye or the insertion of other instruments to obtain tissue samples for biopsies or treat certain abnormalities.

The device’s design allows germs to be carried from one person to another. Experts say the process for cleaning and disinfecting the devices is complicated.

The Result of Defective Design?

There is no question that these endoscopes are sophisticated devices. They present a non-invasive alternative to many seriously ill patients.

But is it not the manufacturer’s responsibility to make a device that can be properly cleaned and disinfected in the real world? How could a manufacturer put a device in the market that could potentially cause germs to be transferred from one patient to another?

This is a real problem this manufacturer will need to address right away. We hope that the FDA does its due diligence when it comes to oversight on this matter.

If you or a loved one has been affected by these contaminated endoscopes, please contact an experienced product liability attorney in Los Angeles to obtain more information about pursuing your legal rights. You may be eligible to receive compensation for your significant losses.

Bard to Pay $21 Million as Part of Major Vaginal Mesh Accord

Comments Off on Bard to Pay $21 Million as Part of Major Vaginal Mesh Accord

Bard Mesh SettlementC.R. Bard has agreed to pay more than $21 million to resolve more than 500 lawsuits alleging that its vaginal mesh implants seriously harmed women.

According to a Bloomberg news report, this is the first large-scale settlement of claims over the company’s devices. The medical device manufacturer agreed to pay an average of more than $43,000 per claim to settle hundreds of vaginal mesh cases.

The deal comes a federal judge in West Virginia ordered lawyers for Bard to prepare for trials of 500 lawsuits that alleged the defective medical devices damages women’s organs and left them with chronic and excruciating pain. With the trials looming, Bard agreed to settle the cases.

More of these settlements are expected in the future as the company faces over 12,400 suits over the vaginal mesh implants.

Severe and Painful Complications

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) ordered manufacturers of vaginal mesh implants including Bard, Johnson & Johnson, Boston Scientific Group and others to study rates of organ damage and complications linked to the devices. The FDA has also said that the implants should be subject to more stringent safety requirements.

In 2010, more than 70,000 women got the implants, which are threaded through incisions in the vagina to shore up pelvic muscles in order to support internal organs or treat incontinence.

Many women reported severe and side effects and complications including the device disintegrating and causing nerve damage, incontinence and pain during intercourse. Our legal team has come across a number of cases where women’s quality of life and livelihoods have been destroyed due to these defective devices.

Lack of Proper Testing

There are a number of medical devices in the market that have been put in the market without being tested properly. These defective vaginal mesh devices are among such products. A number of women have been led to believe that these procedures are minimally invasive and have virtually no side effects.

These women were not given accurate information on which they could make important decisions that would have a significant impact on their health and future.

C.R. Bard and other vaginal mesh implant manufacturers should do right by their customers and compensate them for their losses – physical, financial and emotional. If you or a loved one has suffered side effects due to a vaginal mesh implant, please contact our vaginal mesh attorneys to obtain more information about pursuing your legal rights.

Have You Been Injured By A Defective Hip Implant?

Comments Off on Have You Been Injured By A Defective Hip Implant?

Defective Knee and Hip ImplantsWhen your car is a lemon or is recalled for safety issues, you get it fixed at no cost at the dealership. But, what happens when your artificial hip is defective?

Thousands of Americans have been faced with this problem over the last decade or so. Each year, about 400,000 people in the United States undergo hip replacement surgeries. But, when these hip implants are defective, they create significant problems for those who receive them.

For example, DePuy, a subsidiary of Johnson & Johnson recalled its metal-on-metal hip implants because they were failing very quickly, within a year or two of surgery.

Reports of Early Failure

A WFMY News report gives the example of one patient who felt “clicking” in her newly replaced hip. Not until several years after she got her hip did DePuy admit it had a problem and recalled the device.

DePuy hips are made with all metal. Between 2000 and 2010 DePuy and other companies like Stryker made these components of chromium cobalt metal.

As the parts grind against each other, they produced particles of chromium cobalt that could cause metal poisoning after debris built up in the soft tissues of the body.

Side Effects of Metal Hip Implants

There are many ways in which metal hip implants can fail. Our legal practice has observed based on cases we handle that faulty hip implants can produce significant side effects for patients including:

  • Premature death of body tissue of soft tissue damage due to excessive wear of the implant.
  • Elevated cobalt and chromium levels in the blood, also known as metal poisoning or metallosis.
  • Severe pain in the implant rendering the patient unable to walk.
  • Fluid collection around the joint.

 Protecting Victims’ Rights

Brands of hip implants such as Biomet, Stryker and DePuy have been the subject of a number of recalls and lawsuits. However, when an implant that has been placed inside your body fails, it is not easy to get it out and get it fixed, like you may repair a car part. In such cases, patients must undergo revision surgeries.

This means that the defective implant is surgically removed and replaced with a new device. Patients undergo not only the physical pain and suffering due to unnecessary surgery, but they endure financial burdens, paying medical expenses, hospitalization, cost of surgery and rehabilitation, not to mention lost income.

Some individuals are permanently injured or disabled due to these defective hip implants.

If you or a loved one has received a defective hip implant and have endured serious side effects, please contact an experienced medical device attorney who can help protect your rights and hold the negligent manufacturers accountable.

Incidence Of Hip & Knee Implant Failures Expected To Increase

Comments Off on Incidence Of Hip & Knee Implant Failures Expected To Increase

Defective Knee and Hip ImplantsWith more and more Americans getting hip and knee implants each year, the likelihood of more these implants failing also increases.

According to a Lawyers and Settlements report, with a continuing rise in replacement procedures and continuing problems with latest-generation devices such as metal-on-metal implants, it is fair to assume that more hip and knee implants are likely to fail.

Dramatic Increase in Replacement Surgeries

The Sandusky Register of Ohio reports that more than two out of every 100 people in the United States More

Generic Versions of Heart Drug Recalled for Serious Side Effects

Comments Off on Generic Versions of Heart Drug Recalled for Serious Side Effects

generic heart drug recallTwo large Indian manufacturers of generic heart drugs have announced recalls over the last two months totaling more than 100,000 bottles because of serious reported side effects.

According to an article in The New York Times, the recalls are the latest in the string of recent problems involving generic drugs made by Indian manufacturers such as Wockhardt and Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories.

The drug is a beta blocker that treats More

FDA Warns about Defective Philips Defibrillators that May Fail in Emergency

Comments Off on FDA Warns about Defective Philips Defibrillators that May Fail in Emergency

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has issued a fresh warning to consumers about some models of HeartStart automated external defibrillators (AED) may not work during a cardiac emergency. According to a CBS news report, about 700,000 of the medical devices, manufactured by Philips Medical Systems, had been recalled in 2012, but people may still have the faulty models in their possession. The FDA is urging consumers to inspect and monitor the capabilities of these AEDs and also know how to use them during an emergency, particularly when there are no other available options.

The Philips AEDs first got FDA approval in 2004. The AEDs that are being recalled were manufactured and distributed between 2005 and 2012 under the names HeartStart FRx, HeartStart HS1 Home, and HeartStart HS1 OnSite. These devices were recalled in 2012 because an internal electrical component was malfunctioning, causing the machine not to give a shock.

Why an AED is Life Saving

The federal safety agency is also advising that you keep the recalled HeartStart AEDs in service until you obtain a replacement from Philips or another AED manufacturer. The AED’s function is to analyze heart rhythm and deliver an electric shock, which can restart the heartbeat of those who go into cardiac arrest. In 2013 alone, about 359,400 people will have an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, the American Heart Association estimates. If you still own one of these devices, contact Philips Healthcare for a replacement AED unit. In North America, call 1-800-263-3342 for more information.

Defective Medical Devices

When an AED fails to work as it is supposed to, it may become difficult or impossible to resuscitate someone whose heart has stopped functioning. Anyone who has been affected by a defective medical device can file a product liability claim against the manufacturer of the defective product. In cases where a person has died, his or her family can file a wrongful death claim against the product manufacturer. Victims or families of deceased victims would be well advised to contact an experienced product liability lawyer who will ensure that the negligent manufacturers are held liable. The best product defect law firms will always offer a free consultation and comprehensive case evaluation to injured victims and their families.

FDA Issues Warning on Medtronic Devices

Comments Off on FDA Issues Warning on Medtronic Devices

Federal health officials have issued a defective product recall for about 15,000 Medtronic guide wires used in heart procedures. According to a USA Today news report, the recall was issued after Medtronic received four serious complaints. Officials say that the defects are severe enough to cause injury or death. The guide wires involved in this recall are inserted through an artery and are used to guide other devices into place, such as stents to hold open blocked arteries.

Potential for Serious Injury or Death

In one complaint involving this device, a patient went into cardiac arrest but was resuscitated. The recall notice warned hospitals and distributors worldwide that the coating on the guide wires could break off, which could increase the possibility of blocking a blood vessel. The coating on the wires is meant to make them slide through the blood vessels more easily. The FDA has classified this as a Class I recall, a category reserved for defective products with the potential to cause serious injury or death.

Medtronic, which is based in Minneapolis, said the recall affected certain lots of the products manufactured since April. The company said it has taken steps to prevent new shipment of the wires and has notified regulators globally. Any problems with the defective medical devices can be reported by calling 1-877-526-7890 or to the FDA’s web site at http://www.fda.gov/Safety/MedWatch/HowToReport/default.htm.

Defective Medical Devices

Flaws in medical devices may occur due to manufacturing defects, defective design or defective marketing. If you have been injured or have suffered a loss as the result of a defective medical device, a number of parties may be held liable. The manufacturing company, a testing lab, a medical sales representative, medical clinic or doctor, may all be potentially liable parties in a product liability lawsuit involving a faulty medical device.

If you have been injured as a result of using a faulty medical device, an experienced product liability attorney can help you prove that the device was faulty and caused your injuries. All product manufacturers have a legal obligation to consumers to manufacturer products that are safe and of good quality. When they fail to do so, they can and should be held accountable. Injured victims in such cases can seek compensation for damages such as medical expenses, lost wages, hospitalization, pain and suffering and emotional distress.

Older Entries